Lately I have been feeling extremely overwhelmed between my
three classes. It seems that all my
projects and papers were due within the past two weeks. However, I have taken this past weekend to
re-group and get back on track with my blog.
It was nice to take time to read through my peers’ blogs; they have so
many interesting stories and ideas to take in and think about. After reading several entries, I was hooked
into Caitlin’s blog about expository texts. Her opening sentence drew me right
in…
“Looking back to my years as an elementary
student, I found that much of my reading and writing experiences revolved
around fictional pieces. In fact, while currently working at the elementary
level, I still see this taking place. It usually isn’t until students are at
the middle/high school level, that they begin to incorporate and encounter a
greater amount of expository text/writing experiences” (Entry 9, 2012).
This statement
inspired me to reflect on my own experiences with expository texts. Like Caitlin, much of my reading and writing
in elementary school revolved around fiction.
I cannot name one expository text that I read when I was little, but I
can name many fictional pieces. This
could be due to the fact that I enjoy reading and writing fiction more than
non-fiction. As a result, I find myself
more comfortable utilizing fictional pieces in the classroom. I feel students are more engaged and able to
relate to these types of stories. However
now after reading Caitlin’s blog and listening to the presentation on expository
text, I am more comfortable and better equipped to utilize it in my
instruction.
Primary students are just as able to read and write
non-fiction as middle and upper-level students; it is all in how you teach it. There are several ways students can organize
the information they have learned through reading an expository text. This can be achieved through writing descriptions,
sequence, compromise, cause and effect, and problem and solution of a text. In order to utilize these expository texts
structures with elementary students, I would introduce one structure a month to
focus on. For example, let’s take the
pumpkin cycle as way to teach sequence writing.
First, I would introduce a nonfiction text based on the pumpkin cycle
and read it aloud as a whole group. As I
read, I would ask many engaging and probing questions to spark students’
background knowledge. Together, we would
take the reading slow and explore each page of the text critically. Then we would review what we’ve learned from
the text by filling out a graphic organizer.
I would model how to put the stages of the pumpkin cycle in order. We would continue reading about the pumpkin
cycle and practicing these steps in smaller reading groups. At the end of the month, students would be
assessed on what they’ve learned about the sequence of the pumpkin cycle. They would need to write each stage of the
cycle in order, tell what takes place, and draw an illustration to go along
with it. This could be differentiated
based on the learning needs of a student.
The next month, we would start a new expository structure
with a new common core topic. I think
these types of lessons, like the one I described, would be best for 1st,
2nd, and 3rd graders because they break down the reading and
writing process into steps. The more
practice students have interacting with and writing expository texts, the more
interested in and comfortable they become with them.
This is a great extension of Caitlin's ideas, Kelly. I wonder was there anything specific in Tompkins chapter that you could reference here to further support you thinking?
ReplyDeleteYes, in chapter 9, Tompkins (2012) says, "Too often, teachers assume that students are more comfortable writing stories instead of nonfiction, but researchers [have] provided compelling evidence that children, even those in kindergarten and first grade, can write expository text" (p. 202). This quote relates back to the statement I made in my third paragraph, "Primary students are just as able to read and write non-fiction as middle and upper-level students; it is all in how you teach it." As educators, it is imperative that we have the ability to scaffold and differentiate our lessons to reach students of various learning levels.
ReplyDelete